Justifying why 0/0 is indeterminate and 1/0 is undefined

$\begingroup$

$\dfrac 00=x$
$0x=0$
$x$ can be any value, therefore $\dfrac 00$ can be any value, and is indeterminate.

$\dfrac 10=x$
$0x=1$
There is no such $x$ that satisfies the above, therefore $\dfrac 10$ is undefined.

Is this a reasonable or naive thought process?
It seems too simple to be true.

$\endgroup$ 1

3 Answers

$\begingroup$

Those expressions are about limits, not about numbers.

We say that $\frac00$ is an indeterminate form because a limit of that form can take any value:$$\lim_{y\to0}\frac{xy}y=x,$$for any real number $x$.

On the other hand, a limit of the type $\frac10$ cannot take any value. If it exists, it can only be $\infty$ or $-\infty$.

$\endgroup$ $\begingroup$

In the context of limits, $0/0$ is an indeterminate form (limit could be anything) while $1/0$ is not (limit either doesn't exist or is $\pm\infty$). This is a pretty reasonable way to think about why it is that $0/0$ is indeterminate and $1/0$ is not.

However, as algebraic expressions, neither is defined. Division requires multiplying by a multiplicative inverse, and $0$ doesn't have one.

$\endgroup$ 4 $\begingroup$

The form $\frac{0}{0}$ at $x=x_0$ means that if you find $f(x_0\pm \delta)$ in the neighborhood of $x_0$, you may get a good number. All the following function are of the form $\frac{0}{0}$ at $x=1$; $f(x)=\frac{x-1}{x-1}, \frac{x^2-1}{x-1},\frac{x^3-1}{x-1},...$ but in the small neighborhood of $x=1$ they take different values as $1,~ 2\pm \epsilon(\delta),~ 3\pm \epsilon(\delta),...$, respectively. Here $epsilon(\delta)$ are as small as we may want and this is achieved by coosing very small values of $\delta$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like