Why does Wolfram Alpha handle $\log$ and $\ln$ the same?

$\begingroup$

I thought $\log(n)$ was like $10^x = n$ and $\ln(n)$ was $e^x = n$. But when I do $\ln(80)$, it gives me the answer for $\log$. Why is that?

$\endgroup$ 1

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

It's simply a matter of definitions.

In all fields, $\ln$ means the natural log, or log base $e$, so that $\ln n = x$ whenever $e^x = n$. In engineering (and high school), $\log$ usually means the common log, or log base $10$, so that $\log n = x$ whenever $10^x = n$.

However, it happens that in higher mathematics, the common log just isn't very important. So for convenience, mathematicians often use the notation $\log$ to represent the natural log. Wolfram Alpha does things the same way.

$\endgroup$ 1 $\begingroup$

In theoretical mathematics and in many programming languages "$\log$" usually means natural (base-$e$) logarithm. That's the only logarithm that's important for most theoretical purposes.

Sometimes I've written "log" in an expression on a blackboard and a student has asked "Do you mean logarithm, or natural logarithm?", and I've said "Yes". I dislike "ln" because I suspect it of causing some people to think a natural logarithm is something different from a logarithm, as evidenced by questions like that one.

$\endgroup$ 2

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like